Chances are the law is the last thing on your radar. In plain terms: you requested a stool, lighter duties, or a few extra breaks — and got pushed out, or parked on unpaid leave, for it.
What this actually looks like
Most people don't walk in calling it “pregnancy accommodation discrimination.” They describe a situation:
- You asked for a simple change — a stool, light duty, more frequent breaks, time off for an appointment — and were told no without any real discussion.
- They put you on unpaid leave instead of the small adjustment that would have let you keep working.
- Your hours, your shifts, or your role changed for the worse after you said you were pregnant.
- You were written up or let go soon after you asked for a pregnancy-related accommodation.
Since the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act took effect in 2023, an employer with 15 or more workers must provide reasonable accommodations for known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions — unless it is a genuine undue hardship — cannot force you onto leave when an accommodation would let you keep working, and cannot punish you for asking. In South Dakota it's prohibited by the state Human Rights Law; federally, by The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.
The federal route: the EEOC
The same conduct can be filed federally with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. The federal filing deadline is generally 180–300 days where a state agency exists, and the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act applies to employers with 15+ employees. The EEOC and SD-DHR typically maintain a work-sharing agreement, so one charge can be cross-filed.
Thurgood's representation before the EEOC is nationwide, so for employees in South Dakota the federal charge is typically the lead route.
The South Dakota route: SD-DHR
In South Dakota, a pregnancy accommodation discrimination charge is filed with Division of Human Rights (SD DLR) (SD-DHR), which enforces the state Human Rights Law. The agency investigates and may attempt conciliation or hold a hearing. A complaint generally must be filed within 180 days of the discriminatory act, and the law applies to employers with 1+. Where state representation is permitted, this is the route Thurgood works through for employees in South Dakota.
The statutes & deadlines
Both systems prohibit the same core conduct and protect against retaliation. Here are the specific provisions and the clocks that run on each.
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for a covered entity to — (1) not make reasonable accommodations to the known limitations related to the pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions of a qualified employee, unless such covered entity can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hards
The powers, remedies, and procedures provided in sections 2000e-4, 2000e-5, 2000e-6, 2000e-8, and 2000e-9 of this title shall be the powers, remedies, and procedures this subchapter provides to the Commission, the Attorney General, or any person alleging unlawful employment practices in violation of
It is an unfair or discriminatory practice for any employer to discriminate against any person because of sex with respect to hiring, tenure, terms, or privileges of employment — which South Dakota has applied to require equal treatment of pregnancy-related conditions.
South Dakota law prohibits retaliation against any person who has filed a complaint with the Division of Human Rights, testified on a matter before the Division, or assisted the Division in carrying out the purposes of the Human Relations Act
What happens after you file
A charge isn't a lawsuit, and it doesn't go straight to a judge. Both agencies run an investigation first — but they end differently, and that difference is easy to miss.
Federal — EEOC
- You file a charge with the EEOC.
- The EEOC notifies the employer, which submits a position statement.
- The EEOC investigates and often offers mediation.
- It issues a cause / no-cause determination and attempts conciliation.
- To compel relief, the case goes to court — the EEOC can sue, or issue a right-to-sue letter so the worker can.
South Dakota — SD-DHR
- You file a verified complaint with Division of Human Rights (SD DLR) (SD-DHR).
- The agency notifies the employer and investigates — records, witnesses, position statements.
- It issues a determination, often a probable-cause finding; many matters settle through conciliation along the way.
- Depending on the state, the agency may hold a hearing before an administrative law judge, or issue a determination and a notice of right to sue.
- Where it holds a hearing, the agency can order relief directly — back pay, damages, reinstatement, civil penalties — without a separate lawsuit.
The contrast that's easy to miss: the EEOC investigates and conciliates, but compelling relief generally takes a court. In South Dakota, the federal charge is the route Thurgood works through.
Examples of what can make a pregnancy claim hold up
Strong claims are rarely built on a single overheard comment. They're built on quieter evidence an investigator can test. Examples of what can carry a claim:
- The request and the refusal. A specific accommodation you asked for — and the employer's flat denial or refusal to discuss it — is the core of a PWFA claim; the law expects a back-and-forth, interactive process.
- Forced leave. Being placed on unpaid leave when a modest adjustment would have let you keep working is exactly what the PWFA was written to stop.
- Timing. Cut hours, a demotion, or a firing soon after you disclosed a pregnancy or asked for an accommodation supports the retaliation piece.
- The paper trail. Your written request, the employer's response, any medical note, and accommodations given to others doing similar work — records an investigator can compel.
What you can recover
Remedies generally fall into a few buckets — lost pay, money for the harm itself, and orders that change what the employer does. Under the federal damages-cap framework (shared by Title VII, the ADA, and the PWFA), only compensatory and punitive damages combined are capped, scaling with employer size; back pay, front pay, interest, and attorney's fees sit outside the cap (front pay confirmed uncapped in Pollard v. DuPont; attorney's fees for a prevailing employee). South Dakota's own limits differ — the table separates them.
(fed + South Dakota)Comp + punitive
(federal)Comp + punitive
(South Dakota)
State damages limits vary; confirm against the current statute. Back pay and front pay are wage-based relief and fall outside these caps where available.
These outcomes always depend on the particular facts, and no one can promise a result.
How Thurgood represents you
Across the country, Thurgood represents employees before federal agencies, and before state agencies where the law permits. Working as a trained non-attorney representative, your Authorized Justice Practitioner documents the evidence and timeline, files the formal charge, and carries you through the agency process, from employer outreach through investigation and any hearing. You can start a free evaluation using Thurgood’s CaseFile AI — if your situation qualifies, you’ll be offered a free consultation with an associate who can represent your claim.
Frequently asked questions
Do I file a pregnancy accommodation discrimination claim with South Dakota or the EEOC?
What is the deadline to file a pregnancy accommodation discrimination claim in South Dakota?
What counts as pregnancy accommodation discrimination at work?
Do I need a lawyer to file a pregnancy accommodation discrimination claim in South Dakota?
What is the difference between SD-DHR and going to court?
How much can I recover in a South Dakota pregnancy accommodation discrimination claim?
Can I still file if I already complained to HR or went through an internal process?
A law firm turned me down — does that mean I have no claim?
Not legal advice. Thurgood is an employee-advocacy firm whose Authorized Justice Practitioners represent workers in claims before government agencies such as the EEOC, the U.S. Department of Labor, and state civil-rights and labor agencies. Thurgood practitioners are not attorneys and do not provide legal advice or represent clients in court. This article is general information, not advice about your specific situation, and it makes no promise about the outcome of any claim.