Filing a pregnancy accommodation discrimination claim in Arizona

This probably doesn't feel like a legal problem yet. Here's what it feels like: you requested a stool, lighter duties, or a few extra breaks — and got pushed out, or parked on unpaid leave, for it.

What this actually looks like

Most people don't walk in calling it “pregnancy accommodation discrimination.” They describe a situation:

• You asked for a simple change — a stool, light duty, more frequent breaks, time off for an appointment — and were told no without any real discussion.
• They put you on unpaid leave instead of the small adjustment that would have let you keep working.
• Your hours, your shifts, or your role changed for the worse after you said you were pregnant.
• You were written up or let go soon after you asked for a pregnancy-related accommodation.

Since the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act took effect in 2023, an employer with 15 or more workers must provide reasonable accommodations for known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions — unless it is a genuine undue hardship — cannot force you onto leave when an accommodation would let you keep working, and cannot punish you for asking. In Arizona there's no state fair-employment agency that takes this kind of charge, so it's covered primarily by federal law; federally, by The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.

The federal route: the EEOC

The same conduct can be filed federally with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. The federal filing deadline is generally 180 days, or 300 days where a state or local agency shares jurisdiction, and the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act applies to employers with 15+ employees.

Thurgood's representation before the EEOC is nationwide, so for employees in Arizona the federal charge is typically the lead route.

Arizona: no state agency — the federal route

It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer: 1. To fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to the individual's compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment because of the individual's race, color, religion, sex, age or national origin or on the basis of disability

File a charge with the EEOC, generally within 180 days of the act (up to 300 days where a state or local agency shares jurisdiction); the EEOC then issues a right-to-sue notice.

The statutes & deadlines

Both systems prohibit the same core conduct and protect against retaliation. Here are the specific provisions and the clocks that run on each.

What happens after you file

A charge isn't a lawsuit, and it doesn't go straight to a judge. Both agencies run an investigation first — but they end differently, and that difference is easy to miss.

Federal — EEOC

1. You file a charge with the EEOC.
2. The EEOC notifies the employer, which submits a position statement.
3. The EEOC investigates and often offers mediation.
4. It issues a cause / no-cause determination and attempts conciliation.
5. To compel relief, the case goes to court — the EEOC can sue, or issue a right-to-sue letter so the worker can.

Arizona — no state agency

Arizona has no fair-employment agency that processes these charges, so the federal EEOC process is the route — the steps to the left are what applies.

The contrast that's easy to miss: the EEOC investigates and conciliates, but compelling relief generally takes a court. In Arizona, the federal charge is the route Thurgood works through.

Examples of what can make a pregnancy claim hold up

Strong claims are rarely built on a single overheard comment. They're built on quieter evidence an investigator can test. Examples of what can carry a claim:

• The request and the refusal. A specific accommodation you asked for — and the employer's flat denial or refusal to discuss it — is the core of a PWFA claim; the law expects a back-and-forth, interactive process.
• Forced leave. Being placed on unpaid leave when a modest adjustment would have let you keep working is exactly what the PWFA was written to stop.
• Timing. Cut hours, a demotion, or a firing soon after you disclosed a pregnancy or asked for an accommodation supports the retaliation piece.
• The paper trail. Your written request, the employer's response, any medical note, and accommodations given to others doing similar work — records an investigator can compel.

What you can recover

Remedies generally fall into a few buckets — lost pay, money for the harm itself, and orders that change what the employer does. Under the federal damages-cap framework (shared by Title VII, the ADA, and the PWFA), only compensatory and punitive damages combined are capped, scaling with employer size; back pay, front pay, interest, and attorney's fees sit outside the cap (front pay confirmed uncapped in Pollard v. DuPont; attorney's fees for a prevailing employee). Arizona's own limits differ — the table separates them.

Injunction, reinstatement, back pay, and attorney fees; compensatory and punitive damages are not specified by statute. Back pay and front pay are wage-based relief and fall outside these caps where available.

Any recovery rest on the particular facts, and no one can promise what yours will bring.

How Thurgood represents you

Thurgood appears for employees before federal agencies across the country, and before state agencies wherever it’s allowed. A trained non-attorney representative — your Authorized Justice Practitioner — gathers the evidence and reconstructs the timeline, prepares the formal charge, and sees you through the agency process, from employer outreach through investigation and any hearing. You can start a free evaluation using Thurgood’s CaseFile AI — if it’s a fit, you’ll be offered a free consultation with an associate who can represent your claim.

Frequently asked questions