How Lawyers Work

I didn’t want to give up 30–40% of my settlement

Don’t want to give 30–40% of your settlement to a lawyer? Here is why contingency fees sit there, and how the lower-cost agency route can leave more of any recovery with you.

By Brandon Burns · Authorized Justice Practitioner · 5 min read · 883 words · Updated Jun 7, 2026
This article describes a representation framework, not legal advice. Information provided does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

A 30–40% contingency reflects the cost and risk of litigation. The agency route carries less of both — which changes the math.

General information, not legal advice. Thurgood’s Authorized Justice Practitioners are not attorneys and don’t represent clients in court. If working with an attorney is the right fit for you, that is a path worth taking — this article simply explains how the options compare.
A 30–40% contingency fee reflects the cost, risk, and length of civil litigation — the firm fronts everything and is paid only if you win. For many people that’s a fair trade, since you pay nothing unless you recover. But it isn’t the only way to pursue a claim: the administrative agency process carries less cost and risk, so representation through it can be scaled differently and often leaves more of any recovery with you.

Why contingency sits at 30–40%

The percentage isn’t arbitrary. On contingency the firm is paid only if you win, fronts the case costs, and may carry the matter for a year or two of litigation. The fee compensates for that risk and expense, and the no-win-no-fee structure genuinely opens the courthouse to people who couldn’t pay hourly. It’s a rational arrangement — the question is whether civil litigation is the right vehicle for your claim in the first place. How much does a wrongful termination lawyer cost has the full breakdown.

The agency route changes the inputs

Much of what drives a litigation contingency — discovery, depositions, motions, the long timeline — doesn’t exist in the administrative agency process. With less cost and risk to carry, representation through the agencies can be scaled to that lighter process. The practical effect for many people is that more of any recovery stays with them. If a contingency lawyer whose model fits is available, that’s still a good option — you pay nothing unless you win.

How Thurgood’s fee works

Thurgood’s Authorized Justice Practitioners represent workers before the agencies rather than in court, so our contingency is scaled to administrative representation rather than courtroom litigation — which often leaves more of any recovery with you. Exact terms are set in your agreement before you sign and vary with the matter.

90%+

More than 90% of the workers Thurgood represents were first turned away by a law firm — or never approached one at all.

Source: Thurgood client data

Get an unbiased read with CaseFile AI

Before weighing a 30–40% fee against doing nothing, see what you’re working with. CaseFile AI walks through your situation the same way an intake specialist would — the facts, the timeline, the deadlines that apply to you — and tells you plainly whether there is a claim worth pursuing, with no commission riding on the answer.

Run my situation through CaseFile AI

If your case holds up, the consultation is free

There’s no fee to learn whether your claim is worth pursuing. When CaseFile AI flags a viable claim, you are matched with a Thurgood Authorized Justice Practitioner for a free consultation — a real person who can explain your options and, if it fits, represent you before the agency. No charge to find out where you stand.

Check my case — free

Frequently asked questions

Why do lawyers take 30–40% of a settlement?
The fee reflects the cost and risk of litigation: the firm fronts case expenses, is paid only if you win, and may carry the matter for a year or two. The no-win-no-fee structure also makes representation accessible to people who couldn’t pay by the hour.
Is a contingency fee worth it?
For many people, yes — you pay nothing unless you recover, and the firm absorbs the risk. Whether it’s the best fit depends on whether civil litigation is the right vehicle for your particular claim.
Can I keep more of my settlement?
Possibly. The administrative agency route carries less cost and risk than litigation, so representation through it can be scaled differently and often leaves more of any recovery with you.
Is there a lower-fee alternative to a contingency lawyer?
You can pursue a claim through the agency process yourself at no cost, or with a non-attorney advocate whose fee is scaled to that lighter process rather than to civil litigation.
How is Thurgood’s fee different?
Thurgood’s contingency is scaled to administrative representation rather than courtroom litigation, which often leaves more of any recovery with you. Exact terms are set in your agreement and vary with the matter.

Agencies & legal authorities

Primary law

Related reading

Not legal advice. Thurgood is an employee-advocacy firm whose Authorized Justice Practitioners represent workers in claims before government agencies such as the EEOC, the U.S. Department of Labor, and state civil-rights and labor agencies. Thurgood practitioners are not attorneys and do not provide legal advice or represent clients in court. This article is general information about how the employment-law market works, not advice about your specific situation, and it makes no promise about the outcome of any claim.

Categories How Lawyers Work