This probably doesn't feel like a legal problem yet. You're thinking: you asked for a stool, lighter lifting, or a few more breaks — and got pushed onto unpaid leave or out the door instead.
What this actually looks like
Most people don't walk in calling it “pregnancy accommodation discrimination.” They describe a situation:
- You asked for a simple change — a stool, light duty, more frequent breaks, time off for an appointment — and were told no without any real discussion.
- They put you on unpaid leave instead of the small adjustment that would have let you keep working.
- Your hours, your shifts, or your role changed for the worse after you said you were pregnant.
- You were written up or let go soon after you asked for a pregnancy-related accommodation.
Since the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act took effect in 2023, an employer with 15 or more workers must provide reasonable accommodations for known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions — unless it is a genuine undue hardship — cannot force you onto leave when an accommodation would let you keep working, and cannot punish you for asking. In Connecticut it's prohibited by the state Human Rights Law; federally, by The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.
The Connecticut route: CHRO
In Connecticut, a pregnancy accommodation discrimination charge is filed with Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO), which enforces the state Human Rights Law. The agency investigates and may attempt conciliation or hold a hearing. A complaint generally must be filed within 300 days of the discriminatory act, and the law applies to employers with 3+. Where state representation is permitted, this is the route Thurgood works through for employees in Connecticut.
The federal route: the EEOC
The same conduct can be filed federally with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. The federal filing deadline is generally 180–300 days where a state agency exists, and the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act applies to employers with 15+ employees. The EEOC and CHRO typically maintain a work-sharing agreement, so one charge can be cross-filed.
The statutes & deadlines
Both systems prohibit the same core conduct and protect against retaliation. Here are the specific provisions and the clocks that run on each.
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for a covered entity to — (1) not make reasonable accommodations to the known limitations related to the pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions of a qualified employee, unless such covered entity can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hards
The powers, remedies, and procedures provided in sections 2000e-4, 2000e-5, 2000e-6, 2000e-8, and 2000e-9 of this title shall be the powers, remedies, and procedures this subchapter provides to the Commission, the Attorney General, or any person alleging unlawful employment practices in violation of
It shall be a discriminatory practice in violation of this section for an employer to fail or refuse to make a reasonable accommodation for an employee affected by a pregnancy-related condition, including but not limited to temporary transfer to a less strenuous or hazardous position, modified duties, periodic rest, as
For any person, employer, labor organization or employment agency to discharge, expel or otherwise discriminate against any person because such person has opposed any discriminatory employment practice or because such person has filed a complaint or testified or assisted in any proceeding under sect
What happens after you file
A charge isn't a lawsuit, and it doesn't go straight to a judge. Both agencies run an investigation first — but they end differently, and that difference is easy to miss.
Connecticut — CHRO
- You file a verified complaint with Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO).
- The agency notifies the employer and investigates — records, witnesses, position statements.
- It issues a determination, often a probable-cause finding; many matters settle through conciliation along the way.
- Depending on the state, the agency may hold a hearing before an administrative law judge, or issue a determination and a notice of right to sue.
- Where it holds a hearing, the agency can order relief directly — back pay, damages, reinstatement, civil penalties — without a separate lawsuit.
Federal — EEOC
- You file a charge with the EEOC.
- The EEOC notifies the employer, which submits a position statement.
- The EEOC investigates and often offers mediation.
- It issues a cause / no-cause determination and attempts conciliation.
- To compel relief, the case goes to court — the EEOC can sue, or issue a right-to-sue letter so the worker can.
The contrast that's easy to miss: CHRO can hold a hearing and order a remedy itself, while the EEOC investigates and conciliates but generally needs a court to force one. That's a real reason the state route can matter in Connecticut.
Examples of what can make a pregnancy claim hold up
Strong claims are rarely built on a single overheard comment. They're built on quieter evidence an investigator can test. Examples of what can carry a claim:
- The request and the refusal. A specific accommodation you asked for — and the employer's flat denial or refusal to discuss it — is the core of a PWFA claim; the law expects a back-and-forth, interactive process.
- Forced leave. Being placed on unpaid leave when a modest adjustment would have let you keep working is exactly what the PWFA was written to stop.
- Timing. Cut hours, a demotion, or a firing soon after you disclosed a pregnancy or asked for an accommodation supports the retaliation piece.
- The paper trail. Your written request, the employer's response, any medical note, and accommodations given to others doing similar work — records an investigator can compel.
What you can recover
Remedies generally fall into a few buckets — lost pay, money for the harm itself, and orders that change what the employer does. Under the federal damages-cap framework (shared by Title VII, the ADA, and the PWFA), only compensatory and punitive damages combined are capped, scaling with employer size; back pay, front pay, interest, and attorney's fees sit outside the cap (front pay confirmed uncapped in Pollard v. DuPont; attorney's fees for a prevailing employee). Connecticut's own limits differ — the table separates them.
(fed + Connecticut)Comp + punitive
(federal)Comp + punitive
(Connecticut)
State damages limits vary; confirm against the current statute. Back pay and front pay are wage-based relief and fall outside these caps where available.
The results here always depend on the facts of the case, and no one can promise what yours will bring.
How Thurgood represents you
Thurgood appears for employees before federal agencies across the country, and before state agencies wherever it’s allowed. Working as a trained non-attorney representative, your Authorized Justice Practitioner builds the timeline and evidence, files the formal charge, and carries you through the agency process, from employer outreach through investigation and any hearing. You can start a free evaluation using Thurgood’s CaseFile AI — if everything lines up, you’ll be offered a free consultation with an associate who can represent your claim.
Frequently asked questions
Do I file a pregnancy accommodation discrimination claim with Connecticut or the EEOC?
What is the deadline to file a pregnancy accommodation discrimination claim in Connecticut?
What counts as pregnancy accommodation discrimination at work?
Do I need a lawyer to file a pregnancy accommodation discrimination claim in Connecticut?
What is the difference between CHRO and going to court?
How much can I recover in a Connecticut pregnancy accommodation discrimination claim?
Can I still file if I already complained to HR or went through an internal process?
A law firm turned me down — does that mean I have no claim?
Not legal advice. Thurgood is an employee-advocacy firm whose Authorized Justice Practitioners represent workers in claims before government agencies such as the EEOC, the U.S. Department of Labor, and state civil-rights and labor agencies. Thurgood practitioners are not attorneys and do not provide legal advice or represent clients in court. This article is general information, not advice about your specific situation, and it makes no promise about the outcome of any claim.