You probably aren't thinking in legal terms. What it comes down to is this: you took the medical days you needed — and were punished or terminated as if it were misconduct.
What this actually looks like
Most people don't walk in calling it “disability and sick-leave discrimination.” They describe a situation:
- A “no-fault” attendance or points system counted your disability-related sick days against you like any other absence.
- You were disciplined or fired for medical absences tied to a known condition.
- Things changed for the worse once you disclosed a diagnosis or a need for treatment.
- Time off that should have been handled as an accommodation was treated as misconduct.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, an employer with 15 or more workers cannot treat you worse because of a disability — including penalizing disability-related absences under a rigid attendance policy when adjusting it would be a reasonable accommodation — and cannot retaliate against you for taking medically necessary leave or asserting your rights. In Florida it's prohibited by the state Human Rights Law; federally, by The Americans with Disabilities Act.
The Florida route: FCHR
In Florida, a disability and sick-leave discrimination charge is filed with Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR), which enforces the state Human Rights Law. The agency investigates and may attempt conciliation or hold a hearing. A complaint generally must be filed within 365 days of the discriminatory act, and the law applies to employers with 15+. Where state representation is permitted, this is the route Thurgood works through for employees in Florida.
The federal route: the EEOC
The same conduct can be filed federally with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The federal filing deadline is generally 180–300 days where a state agency exists, and the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to employers with 15+ employees. The EEOC and FCHR typically maintain a work-sharing agreement, so one charge can be cross-filed.
The statutes & deadlines
Both systems prohibit the same core conduct and protect against retaliation. Here are the specific provisions and the clocks that run on each.
No covered entity shall discriminate against a qualified individual on the basis of disability in regard to job application procedures, the hiring, advancement, or discharge of employees, employee compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.
No person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter or because such individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this chapter.
It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer: (a) To discharge or to fail or refuse to hire any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, pregnancy, natio
It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer, an employment agency, a joint labor-management committee, or a labor organization to discriminate against any person because that person has opposed any practice which is an unlawful employment practice under this section, or because that person
What happens after you file
A charge isn't a lawsuit, and it doesn't go straight to a judge. Both agencies run an investigation first — but they end differently, and that difference is easy to miss.
Florida — FCHR
- You file a verified complaint with Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR).
- The agency notifies the employer and investigates — records, witnesses, position statements.
- It issues a determination, often a probable-cause finding; many matters settle through conciliation along the way.
- Depending on the state, the agency may hold a hearing before an administrative law judge, or issue a determination and a notice of right to sue.
- Where it holds a hearing, the agency can order relief directly — back pay, damages, reinstatement, civil penalties — without a separate lawsuit.
Federal — EEOC
- You file a charge with the EEOC.
- The EEOC notifies the employer, which submits a position statement.
- The EEOC investigates and often offers mediation.
- It issues a cause / no-cause determination and attempts conciliation.
- To compel relief, the case goes to court — the EEOC can sue, or issue a right-to-sue letter so the worker can.
The contrast that's easy to miss: FCHR can hold a hearing and order a remedy itself, while the EEOC investigates and conciliates but generally needs a court to force one. That's a real reason the state route can matter in Florida.
Examples of what can make a disability claim hold up
Strong claims are rarely built on a single overheard comment. They're built on quieter evidence an investigator can test. Examples of what can carry a claim:
- The policy applied mechanically. An attendance or points system that counted disability-related absences the same as any other — with no room to adjust — is the heart of the claim.
- Notice of the condition. Evidence the employer knew about your condition or your need for treatment ties the discipline to the disability.
- Comparators. Coworkers without your condition who were treated more leniently for similar absences anchor the comparison.
- The record. Medical documentation, attendance records, and the employer's own policy — documents an investigator can demand rather than leaving you to assemble them.
What you can recover
Remedies generally fall into a few buckets — lost pay, money for the harm itself, and orders that change what the employer does. Under the federal damages-cap framework (shared by Title VII, the ADA, and the PWFA), only compensatory and punitive damages combined are capped, scaling with employer size; back pay, front pay, interest, and attorney's fees sit outside the cap (front pay confirmed uncapped in Pollard v. DuPont; attorney's fees for a prevailing employee). Florida's own limits differ — the table separates them.
(fed + Florida)Comp + punitive
(federal)Comp + punitive
(Florida)
State damages limits vary; confirm against the current statute. Back pay and front pay are wage-based relief and fall outside these caps where available.
Outcomes are driven by the record, and no one can promise what yours will bring.
How Thurgood represents you
Thurgood represents employees before federal agencies nationwide, and before state agencies where representation is permitted. Working as a trained non-attorney representative, your Authorized Justice Practitioner gathers the evidence and reconstructs the timeline, puts together the formal charge, and represents you through the agency process, from employer outreach through investigation and any hearing. You can start a free evaluation using Thurgood’s CaseFile AI — once the facts are clear, you’ll be offered a free consultation with an associate who can represent your claim.
Frequently asked questions
Do I file a disability and sick-leave discrimination claim with Florida or the EEOC?
What is the deadline to file a disability and sick-leave discrimination claim in Florida?
What counts as disability and sick-leave discrimination at work?
Do I need a lawyer to file a disability and sick-leave discrimination claim in Florida?
What is the difference between FCHR and going to court?
How much can I recover in a Florida disability and sick-leave discrimination claim?
Can I still file if I already complained to HR or went through an internal process?
A law firm turned me down — does that mean I have no claim?
Not legal advice. Thurgood is an employee-advocacy firm whose Authorized Justice Practitioners represent workers in claims before government agencies such as the EEOC, the U.S. Department of Labor, and state civil-rights and labor agencies. Thurgood practitioners are not attorneys and do not provide legal advice or represent clients in court. This article is general information, not advice about your specific situation, and it makes no promise about the outcome of any claim.